|
A liberal
author who tries to determine principles of just society with the
help of hypothetical contract among members of a society. It is
supposed that individuals who make this contract primarily care
for their self-interest, that they are rational, well informed about
human nature and functioning of society, and that they are placed
under so called veil of ignorance. This last and the most
important condition means that they do not know anything about those
of their characteristics and circumstances that might influence
impartiality of the decision-making. Since economic talent belongs
to those characteristics, and since every party to the contract
is afraid (not knowing his willingness to accept risks) that he
could discover that he lacks such a talent after the veil is lifted,
but at the same time wants to secure to himself as good position
as possible, the difference principle will be chosen. It
says that economic inequalities are allowed but only if they benefit
even the least advantaged individuals. Namely, at the first glance
it seems that this approach would induce individuals to chose strict
equality among all members of their society. However, such a decision
would not be beneficial to anyone because in that case the talented
individuals would not want to work as productively as they otherwise
could, which would result in inferior wealth of the whole society.
Therefore, even those who are afraid that they might discover that
they are the least advantaged (all the parties to the Rawlsian contract
feel such a fear), would accept to grant greater share of resources
to the talented but only if the latter give them some part of their
extra wealth. This principle is in practice viewed as a justification
of progressive taxation of the rich.
Rawls
has many followers. The most important of them are:
Bruce Ackerman, Brian Barry, Will Kymlicka, Thomas Nagel, Thomas
Pogge, Jeremy Waldron, etc.
|
|